Showing posts with label law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label law. Show all posts

Roundup

Quick roundup of interesting things:


Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

OJ Simpson tells how he might have done it...

Totally creepy.

OJ Simpson is reportedly writing a book called If I Did It; a hypothetical account of what might have happened if he had murdered his ex wife Nicole and Ron Goldman (via Sympatico/MSN and MSNBC).

At this point, he has nothing to lose, due to double jeopardy laws which prevent him from being re-tried for the murders.

It will be interesting to see if this report is true. If it is, it proves that he is one sick man.

Technorati tags: , , , ,

5 things feminism has done for me

Scott from Progressive Bloggers asked me to write a list of 5 things feminism has done for me. For those of you who haven't read one of these lists yet, here's the background: Despite having a $13 billion surplus this year, the government has cut $5 million of funding to Status of Women Canada. In response, many Canadian bloggers have been posting lists of '5 things feminism has done for me', to show their support for the goals of the SWC.


Before I begin, I'll say that although I support women's rights and equality for all, I've never really considered myself a 'feminist'. I'm not quite sure why.. perhaps it's because today feminism almost seems to have become a dirty word. It seems like a lot of people associate feminists with radical man-haters, although that's certainly not a universal trait. But, while I may not agree with every stance of feminist groups, I value the changes that women's groups have made in our society, and many of those that they continue to lobby for.


5 Things Feminism Has Done For Me

1. It has made me realize, from a young age, that women can do anything.
Women can be politicians, scientists, astronauts and firefighters, and they can do their jobs as well as men. We need not be forced into predetermined gender stereotypes.

2. It has made me realize that while women can do anything, we don't have to do everything.
We can be anything we want, but we don't need to force ourselves to try to be superwomen. To me, feminism is about recognizing your options, and making the choices that work best for you. Someone who is a stay at home mom isn't necessarily less of a feminist than the CEO of a large company. We all advocate in our own, different ways.

3. It has made me expect to be judged on my merits, not only my looks.
Realistically, almost everyone is judged on their looks these days - men included. But I'm happy to see that most women no longer expect to get (or not get) a job because of the way they look. They expect employers to read their resume and evaluate their relevant skills. Thankfully, in many professions, employers do that.

4. It has made me proud to live in a society where I have the freedom to speak my mind, regardless of my gender.
I have the right to vote, debate in a public forum, enter politics, and challenge my husband or father if I think they're wrong. I need not keep quiet because of my gender.

5. It has shown me that while we like to think that we live in an equal society, we still have far to go, and must continue working.
The funding cuts to the Status of Women Canada are a big one here, but two big (personal) moments of enlightenment for me were firm interviews, and also hearing young, well educated male university classmates scoff at the idea of pay equity. We still have far to go to reach equality in practice, and in people's minds and hearts.


Wikipedia entry for feminism

Over at Progressive Bloggers, they're suggesting that everyone who writes a list should 'tag' 5 other (male or female) bloggers to see if they're willing to participate. I'd like to invite Apartment Girl, Vickyth, Becky, helmut, and Heather.

Thanks to Politics & Poetry for the link to Status Report.

Technorati tags:
, , , , , , ,

Mickey wants your fingerprints

Disney World has started using fingerprint scanners at their park entrances to ensure that the person using a ticket is the person who bought it. Naturally, privacy experts are concerned, as they argue that "Disney's use of the technology 'fails a proportionality test' by requiring too much personal information for access to rollercoasters."

When I went to Disney World in 2004, they didn't have to scan any body parts to let me into the park; only my ticket. If I were to go back now, I'd be very wary about letting park attendants scan my fingerprints. Although Disney says that the biometric data is purged 30 days after the park ticket expires, the potential for misuse of the information if someone were to hack into their system is a definite concern.

It's also disturbing that "There are no signs posted at the entrances detailing what information is being collected and how it is being used". I like to know what is done with my personal information, and I think park visitors should be told up-front, rather than having to find and ask an employee (who may or may not be well-informed or able to provide details).

For those of you wary of this new technology, keep this tip in mind if you're heading to the House of Mouse: although it's not advertised, visitors who object to the new technology can provide photo ID instead.

Bomb or glorified firecracker? Harmful intent or 'boys will be boys'?

What causes someone to be branded a terrorist? Or a security threat? Is it harmful intent? It is having a history of exploding bombs for entertainment value? Is it carrying a bomb onto an airplane?

What if you're a white, Christian, U.S. boy with Republican parents? In that case, maybe the mayor will defend you as only having made a "glorified firecracker" and accidentally putting it in your luggage. It's harmless, because as we all know, "boys like to see things go bang".

Can you imagine anyone else doing the same thing, and while out on bail, only having to live at Mommy & Daddy's, and adhere to a 10pm curfew? How would this situation be different if the guy wasn't white? Or if he was Muslim? Imagine the field day Homeland Security and the media would have, even if no ties were found to a terrorist organization.

Federal agents arrested Charles Alfred Dreyling Jr., 24, on Wednesday at a security checkpoint after a Transportation Security Administration employee noticed something suspicious in his carryon luggage as it went through an X-ray machine about 9:30 a.m., FBI spokesman Gary Johnson said.

The device was described in an FBI affidavit as a carbon dioxide cartridge filled with gunpowder that could be detonated when connected to a power source such as the batteries Dreyling had in his electric razor and in his cell phone, which were also in his carryon bag.
...

Dreyling faces a federal charge of trying to get on an aircraft with an explosive device. The charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

He was released to the custody of his mother, Vicki Dreyling. His terms of release include living at his parents' home in north Oklahoma City and a 10 p.m. curfew.
...

Former Oklahoma City Mayor Kirk Humphreys, who is Dreyling's landlord and his longtime friend, also came to the hearing.

Humphreys said Dreyling had created a ''glorified firecracker'' and then forgotten that it was in his luggage.
...

Dreyling said he learned as a teenager how to build homemade explosives from Web sites like ''The Anarchist's Cook Book.'' Dreyling said he has built and detonated several explosive devices for recreational purposes, according to the affidavit.

He also told authorities that he had a bag of gunpowder, an empty carbon dioxide cartridge, and several ignitors in his Norman residence, according to the affidavit.
...

[Mayor Humphries said] "I have every confidence that they'll find out Charlie Dreyling is a fine young man and no terrorist. He had a little explosive device, and boys like to see things go bang. He took it down to an outing at the lake, left it in his bag, forgot it and went to the airport."

August 12, 2005 Airport Business article
(via Hullabaloo and Canadian Cynic)

Another interesting twist...

Many people have thought for a while now that fishy things were happening (or not happening) in the Ianiero murder investigation. It seemed strange that the resort tried to keep things so quiet, even going so far as mopping up the victims' blood and cutting the grass outside their hotel room the morning after the murder. There was the fact that the Mexican authorities seemed so sure that the prime suspects were two Canadian women from Thunder Bay. Then there was the whole story about a young girl finding a knife in her backpack a few resorts away, and bringing it home to the U.S. with her.

The latest news is that local authorities are looking for a former Mexican soldier in connection with the murder; a man who coincidentally worked at the resort, and went missing a day after the Ianieros were murdered. Frankly, that seems like a no-brainer, so hopefully they've been looking for him for a while, not just now, 5 months after the murders.

Weirder still... Quintano Roo Attorney General Bello Melchor Rodriguez "told the Star that he and the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation had launched an investigation to find the suspect, who was believed to be in the United States. However, an FBI spokesman told the Star that he was unaware of any such probe."

Spying affects everyone


Technorati tags: , , , , , ,

A GREAT use of the police force's time

A high school student has been charged with trafficking in an incident involving a single joint.

The guy shouldn't have brought pot onto school grounds, but calling the police to charge him with trafficking is a bit much. In my opinion, suspending or expelling him would have supported the school's zero-tolerance policy. Save the trafficking charges for people who are distributing quantities of drugs, not just passing a joint.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Quirk of the law

Ha ha ha... something they didn't teach us in law school. Well, not formally anyways... ;)


Courtesy of Space Monkey Pants. Read more comics on Wondermark.

Technorati tags: , ,

A 'right' to be intolerant?

The blog Grrrl Meets World has an thought-provoking post about people who claim that they have a "right" to be intolerant; namely, a right to speak out against homosexuality, even when it is done in a way that it contravenes anti-discrimination laws.

Many of the observations she makes also seem to apply to other religions and viewpoints - not just about homosexuality.

Food for thought (click the link above to read her entire post):

How many times has hate been spread, all under the guise of religious piety?

Why does there have to be an ultimatium when it comes to the public practice of religion (particularly, Christianity)? It's seen as all or nothing -- if you want to censor the hateful and discrimatory parts of a religion, then you're viewed as attempting to suppress the whole faith system, including the positive giving/loving/encouraging aspects of it.
...

In many religions, you'll find a version of The Golden Rule -- do unto others as you would have them do unto you. It's such a simple, foundational concept, but it's ignored when we turn people different from us into the Other. When we objectify them as "Other," we forget about the golden rule, and sacrifice our fellow human beings to our religious ideologies.

Technorati tags:
, , , ,

Things that have caught my eye...

  • A great blog on marketing that I stumbled across today.

  • A messy desk messes with your career. I'm trying my best to organize my office. Even before reading this article, we bought another filing cabinet and created a shiny new filing system. Next step: tackling all of my little piles of paper...

  • Make better movies. I totally agree.

  • Humorous... Speech (I wish I could get the embedded YouTube player to work for this one! Click on the link)

  • Download free MP3 stories, lectures, poems and speeches, and Learn Out Loud while you drive, excercise or do housework

  • Logic Puzzles. I loved these as a child, and recently started doing them again. I remember my grade... 4 teacher, I think it was, would give us one of these to work on at least once a week. I had another teacher who would put a few brain teasers on the blackboard every morning to start our day. Ahh.. memories...

In the ongoing (weirder and weirder) investigation into the murders of a Canadian couple staying at a resort in Mexico... Ontario police are examining a knife which may have a connection to the murders.
Three days after the Ianiero murders, a 12-year-old American girl vacationing with her family found the knife in her knapsack.

"My understanding is [the knife] was found in a bag in a resort some distance away from where the Ianieros were actually murdered," York Police Chief Armand LaBarge told CBC News.

The Duluth, Minn., family brought it back to the United States and the girl's father, a police officer, turned it over to police in nearby Thunder Bay, Ont.

What I want to know is: who the hell finds a knife stuffed in their backpack while on vacation, and then brings it home?! That is not a souvenir, people!!


Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

Future American lawyers protest Attorney General's speech

(originally posted January 30th, 2006)

Quoted from Insomnia:

"Alberto Gonzales spoke before law students at Georgetown [on January 24th], justifying illegal, unauthorized surveilance of US citizens, but during the course of his speech the students in class did something pretty ballsy and brave. They got up from their seats and turned their backs to him. ... [A]dditional students came into the room, wearing black cowls and carrying a simple banner, written on a sheet."


The Attorney General's speech was followed by a panel discussion, where one of the students' profs said:

"When you're a law student, they tell you if say that if you can't argue the law, argue the facts. They also tell you if you can't argue the facts, argue the law. If you can't argue either, apparently, the solution is to go on a public relations offensive and make it a political issue... to say over and over again "it's lawful", and to think that the American people will somehow come to believe this if we say it often enough. In light of this, I'm proud of the very civil civil disobedience that was shown here today."

- David Cole, Georgetown University Law Professor

Links to info on Insomnia, BoingBoing, and ABC

Text Messages Used as Evidence in Court

Transcripts of text messages have been admitted as evidence in the Brampton, Ontario court case of two teenagers accused of drowning their alcoholic mother in a bathtub. Sick crime, but it shows the emergence of an interesting Canadian precedent.

Link to story

SONY Music CDs Contain Copy-Protection

(originally posted November 16, 2005)

For those of you who haven't heard yet, some interesting news has been swirling around over the past couple of weeks regarding copy-protection on SONY/BMG Music CDs. The record label had placed DRM (Digital Rights Management) software on some of their CDs, which installs a rootkit onto Windows PCs when the CDs are played on the computer. According to Mark Russinovich, who discovered the rootkit,

"Rootkits are cloaking technologies that hide files, Registry keys, and other system objects from diagnostic and security software, and they are usually employed by malware attempting to keep their implementation hidden."

The software on the CDs automatically installs when the CD is played, and limits the amount of copies that may may be made. It disguises itself as essential files, and most shockingly, if a user deletes the cloaked files, it will disable Windows. The End User Licence Agreement on the CDs makes no mention of the fact that software will be installed that the user can not uninstall.

In addition to all of this, experts agree that trojans and other malware can use the rootkit to hide on users' computers, and although SONY has created an uninstall for the rootkit, experts warn not to download the current version of the uninstaller, as it will create security vulnerabilities on your PC.

Due to public backlash, SONY has issued a list of CDs containing the rootkit (although one wonders about the completeness of the list), has stopped the production of CDs containing it, and claims that it will shortly re-release those CDs without the technology. It is staggering to think of the amount of infected CDs currently in stores, in people's homes, and the number of computers that have already been infected, though.

Links to stories:
Schneier on Security - Nov 1
Schneier on Security - Nov 15
Boing Boing
Mark Russinovich's Sysinternals Blog

In fact, Boing Boing has also reported that government agencies are banning the use of SONY CDs in the workplace, due to security concerns. Alberta Agriculture has banned all CDs!

Mobile Voting

(originally posted November 4th, 2005)

Here's an interesting website about mobile voting and voter registration. Thus far, mobile technology has only been used in a rudimetiary way by North American politicians and governments, but the city of San Francisco has launched a campaign for mobile voter registration. The campaign, largely geared towards youth, is being advertised on billboards, on taxis and at concerts. Voters who register through SMS (using a short code) will also be sent a text message on election day, reminding them to vote.

Links to stories in CNET, 160 Characters and the official website blog, Mobile Voter

Why you should always proof-read (not just spell check) court documents...

Link to document